GeForce4 Ti 4400 vs UHD Graphics Xe G1

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNV25 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)6 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speedno data275 MHz
Number of transistorsno data63 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data2.200
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Lengthno data216 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_18.1
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 6 February 2002
Chip lithography 10 nm 150 nm

UHD Graphics Xe G1 has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics Xe G1 and GeForce4 Ti 4400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe G1 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce4 Ti 4400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G1
UHD Graphics Xe G1
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce4 Ti 4400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 69 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe G1 or GeForce4 Ti 4400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.