GMA 900 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1501not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Generation 3.0 (2005)
GPU code nameNV25 A2Alviso
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (22 years ago)2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz333 MHz
Number of transistors63 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate2.0001.332
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xFSB
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.31.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

GMA 900 has a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 Ti 4200 and GMA 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 Ti 4200 is a desktop card while GMA 900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
GeForce4 Ti 4200
Intel GMA 900
GMA 900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 37 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 21 vote

Rate GMA 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.