Radeon R5 A240 vs GeForce4 MX 440
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce4 MX 440 and Radeon R5 A240, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
R5 A240 outperforms MX 440 by a whopping 13700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1580 | 1049 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.13 |
| Architecture | Celsius (1999−2005) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | NV17 A3 | Oland |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 February 2002 (24 years ago) | 2014 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 275 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 780 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 29 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.100 | 15.60 |
| ROPs | 2 | 8 |
| TMUs | 4 | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 200 MHz | 1800 MBps |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 8.0 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 (5.1) |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.1 (1.2) |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.170 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.01 | 1.38 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 28 nm |
R5 A240 has a 13700% higher aggregate performance score, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon R5 A240 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 440 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
