GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 MX 440 and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 MX 440
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms GeForce4 MX 440 by a whopping 609100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking152235
Place by popularitynot in top-10087
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.72
Power efficiencyno data14.43
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV17 A3GA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 February 2002 (23 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed275 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors29 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data290 Watt
Texture fill rate1.100339.8
Floating-point processing powerno data21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs4192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s608.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 MX 440 0.01
RTX 3070 Ti 60.92
+609100%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 MX 440 4
RTX 3070 Ti 23472
+586700%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1177
1440p-0−193
4K-0−160

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.38
1440pno data6.44
4Kno data9.98

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 193
+0%
193
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 178
+0%
178
+0%
Atomic Heart 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 152
+0%
152
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 205
+0%
205
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 210
+0%
210
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Atomic Heart 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Dota 2 249
+0%
249
+0%
Far Cry 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+0%
173
+0%
Metro Exodus 145
+0%
145
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 292
+0%
292
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Dota 2 230
+0%
230
+0%
Far Cry 5 183
+0%
183
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+0%
147
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+0%
137
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Far Cry 5 150
+0%
150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35
+0%
35
+0%
Dota 2 194
+0%
194
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 60.92
Recency 6 February 2002 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX 3070 Ti has a 609100% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 440 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce4 MX 440
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8
261 vote

Rate GeForce4 MX 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
6535 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX 440 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.