NX-SoC vs GeForce4 MX 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1507not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNV17 A3GM20B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (22 years ago)17 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed250 MHz384 MHz
Boost clock speedno data768 MHz
Number of transistors29 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00012.29
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3932 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR4
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 17 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 20 nm

NX-SoC has an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 420 and NX-SoC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 420 is a desktop card while NX-SoC is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420
GeForce4 MX 420
NVIDIA NX-SoC
NX-SoC

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 23 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate NX-SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.