ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs GeForce4 MX 4000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV18 A4RV730
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 December 2003 (20 years ago)1 June 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed250 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors29 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00019.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-A (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2003 1 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 55 nm

ATI E4690 MXM has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 4000 and Radeon E4690 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 4000 is a desktop card while Radeon E4690 MXM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
GeForce4 MX 4000
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM
Radeon E4690 MXM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 938 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E4690 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.