GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs GeForce4 460 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 460 Go and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 460 Go
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms GeForce4 460 Go by a whopping 398600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1551116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data60.81
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNV17 A5GB207
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 October 2002 (22 years ago)24 June 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22560
Core clock speed250 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors29 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000201.6
Floating-point processing powerno data12.9 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 460 Go 0.01
RTX 5050 Mobile 39.87
+398600%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 460 Go 5
RTX 5050 Mobile 16707
+334040%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 90−95
God of War 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 90−95
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7650%
150−160
+7650%
God of War 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2517%
150−160
+2517%
Valorant 21−24
−909%
230−240
+909%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2989%
270−280
+2989%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 90−95
Dota 2 7−8
−398471%
27900−27950
+398471%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7650%
150−160
+7650%
God of War 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2517%
150−160
+2517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2780%
140−150
+2780%
Valorant 21−24
−909%
230−240
+909%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 90−95
Dota 2 7−8
−398471%
27900−27950
+398471%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7650%
150−160
+7650%
God of War 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2517%
150−160
+2517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2780%
140−150
+2780%
Valorant 21−24
−398596%
91700−91750
+398596%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−5000%
100−110
+5000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−11500%
110−120
+11500%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−487%
85−90
+487%
Valorant 0−1 240−250

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5500%
55−60
+5500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
God of War 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
God of War 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 11500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile performs better in 20 tests (37%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (63%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 39.87
Recency 14 October 2002 24 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

RTX 5050 Mobile has a 398600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 22 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 460 Go in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go
GeForce4 460 Go
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 460 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 84 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 460 Go or GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.