GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs GeForce4 460 Go

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 460 Go and GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 460 Go
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms GeForce4 460 Go by a whopping 375300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1506124
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
Power efficiencyno data51.68
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV17 A5AD107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 October 2002 (22 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22560
Core clock speed250 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors29 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000140.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 460 Go 0.01
RTX 4050 Mobile 37.54
+375300%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 460 Go 5
RTX 4050 Mobile 14427
+288440%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−195
1440p-0−147
4K-0−131

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−778%
79
+778%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5050%
103
+5050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−644%
67
+644%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1950%
41
+1950%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3980%
204
+3980%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−556%
59
+556%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
36
+1700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1840%
97
+1840%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3260%
168
+3260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4825%
190−200
+4825%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3200%
130−140
+3200%
World of Tanks 8−9
−3388%
270−280
+3388%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−378%
43
+378%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1550%
33
+1550%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2800%
145
+2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4825%
190−200
+4825%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 170−180

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18
+500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2925%
120−130
+2925%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1867%
59
+1867%
Valorant 4−5
−2200%
92
+2200%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8
+14.3%
Dota 2 14−16
−327%
64
+327%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−327%
64
+327%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−327%
64
+327%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9
+350%
Dota 2 14−16
−667%
115
+667%
Valorant 0−1 60−65

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 185
+0%
185
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Dota 2 140
+0%
140
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 126
+0%
126
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Dota 2 162
+0%
162
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Valorant 138
+0%
138
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
World of Tanks 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+0%
84
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 45
+0%
45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 4050 Mobile is 5050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is ahead in 30 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 37.54
Recency 14 October 2002 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 4 nm

RTX 4050 Mobile has a 375300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 460 Go in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go
GeForce4 460 Go
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 460 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2926 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.