ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 vs GeForce4 4200 Go

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 4200 Go and Radeon Xpress 1250, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 4200 Go
2002
128 MB DDR
0.01

ATI Xpress 1250 outperforms GeForce4 4200 Go by a whopping 800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15311457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataR400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameNV28MRS690
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 November 2002 (22 years ago)28 February 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64
Core clock speed2 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed200 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data120 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm80 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.600
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR9.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 4200 Go 0.01
ATI Xpress 1250 0.09
+800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 4200 Go 3
ATI Xpress 1250 42
+1300%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 1−2

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI Xpress 1250 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Xpress 1250 is ahead in 5 tests (19%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (81%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 0.09
Recency 15 November 2002 28 February 2007
Chip lithography 150 nm 80 nm

ATI Xpress 1250 has a 800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 87.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Xpress 1250 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 4200 Go in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go
GeForce4 4200 Go
ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Radeon Xpress 1250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 4200 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 4200 Go or Radeon Xpress 1250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.