RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation vs GeForce4 410 Go

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV17 A3AD107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (22 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed200 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2025 MHz
Number of transistors29 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8162.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce4 410 Go and RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation has an age advantage of 22 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 410 Go and RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 410 Go is a desktop card while RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 410 Go
GeForce4 410 Go
NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 410 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.