FirePro A300 vs GeForce2 MX DH Pro TV PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameNV11 A2Trinity GL
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2000 (24 years ago)6 June 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed175 MHz760 MHz
Boost clock speedno data905 MHz
Number of transistors20 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate0.721.72
Floating-point processing powerno data0.695 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.24.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2000 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 180 nm 32 nm

FirePro A300 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX DH Pro TV PCI and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX DH Pro TV PCI is a desktop card while FirePro A300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX DH Pro TV PCI
GeForce2 MX DH Pro TV PCI
AMD FirePro A300
FirePro A300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX DH Pro TV PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.