Quadro NVS 55 PCI vs GeForce2 Go 200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNV11 B2NV34 B1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 February 2001 (23 years ago)31 May 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed143 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors20 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate0.571.000
ROPs22
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.09.0a
OpenGL1.21.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2001 31 May 2005
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 10 Watt

GeForce2 Go 200 has 400% lower power consumption.

NVS 55 PCI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Go 200 and Quadro NVS 55 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 Go 200 is a notebook card while Quadro NVS 55 PCI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 200
GeForce2 Go 200
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 55 PCI
Quadro NVS 55 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 Go 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 55 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.