RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency72.08no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGB205GB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58888960
Core clock speed847 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1447 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors31,100 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate266.2374.4
Floating-point processing power17.04 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs8096
TMUs184280
Tensor Cores184280
Ray Tracing Cores4670

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount12 GB24 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA12.012.0
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency on March 2025 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 24 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 16.7% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 184 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.