Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics vs GeForce RTX 4090

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1not rated
Place by popularity6not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.46no data
Power efficiency15.23no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameAD102Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 September 2022 (2 years ago)6 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16384128
Core clock speed2235 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2520 MHz847 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)450 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1,2906.400
Floating-point processing power82.58 TFLOPS0.2048 TFLOPS
ROPs1764
TMUs5128
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length304 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1313 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.01 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.86.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2.170
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 September 2022 6 June 2014
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 450 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 4090 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

R5E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 2900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4090 and Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop card while Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090
AMD Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 14743 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.