Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4090

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1not rated
Place by popularity6not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.82no data
Power efficiency15.22no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameAD102Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 September 2022 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16384512
Core clock speed2235 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2520 MHz1750 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)450 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate1,29056.00
Floating-point processing power82.58 TFLOPS1.792 TFLOPS
ROPs17616
TMUs51232
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length304 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1313 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.01 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 September 2022 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 450 Watt 65 Watt

RTX 4090 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 592.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4090 and Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090
Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 14805 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 20 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.