Radeon PRO W7900 vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Place in the ranking	27	12
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	16.63
Power efficiency	40.89	17.89
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	AD104	Navi 31
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)	13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7424	6144
Core clock speed	1290 MHz	1855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	2495 MHz
Number of transistors	35,800 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	295 Watt
Texture fill rate	386.3	958.1
Floating-point processing power	24.72 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	80	192
TMUs	232	384
Tensor Cores	232	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	58	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	280 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	864.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4080 Mobile 65.07

PRO W7900 76.35
+17.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4080 Mobile 25104

PRO W7900 29456
+17.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	159 −13.2%	180−190 +13.2%
1440p	103 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
4K	73 −16.4%	85−90 +16.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	22.22
1440p	no data	33.33
4K	no data	47.05

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

149

−14.1%

170−180
+14.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −17.1%	130−140 +17.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −7.5%	100−105 +7.5%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −12.4%	190−200 +12.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	143 −11.9%	160−170 +11.9%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −14.3%	120−130 +14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −17.2%	150−160 +17.2%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −14.7%	250−260 +14.7%
Hitman 3	110−120 −16.1%	130−140 +16.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −16.5%	240−250 +16.5%
Metro Exodus	140−150 −14.1%	170−180 +14.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −9.1%	120−130 +9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 −15.4%	240−250 +15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −11.1%	160−170 +11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −17.1%	130−140 +17.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −7.5%	100−105 +7.5%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −12.4%	190−200 +12.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	124 −12.9%	140−150 +12.9%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −14.3%	120−130 +14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −17.2%	150−160 +17.2%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −14.7%	250−260 +14.7%
Hitman 3	110−120 −16.1%	130−140 +16.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −16.5%	240−250 +16.5%
Metro Exodus	140−150 −14.1%	170−180 +14.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −9.1%	120−130 +9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	351 −14%	400−450 +14%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −9.1%	120−130 +9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −11.1%	160−170 +11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −17.1%	130−140 +17.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	118 −10.2%	130−140 +10.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	121 −15.7%	140−150 +15.7%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −14.3%	120−130 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −14.7%	250−260 +14.7%
Hitman 3	110−120 −16.1%	130−140 +16.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −16.5%	240−250 +16.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	318 −10.1%	350−400 +10.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	172 −16.3%	200−210 +16.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110 −9.1%	120−130 +9.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−9.1%

120−130
+9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −9.1%	120−130 +9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −15.9%	95−100 +15.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	93 −7.5%	100−105 +7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −11.1%	70−75 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	82 −15.9%	95−100 +15.9%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −12.9%	70−75 +12.9%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 −13.6%	300−310 +13.6%
Hitman 3	70−75 −14.9%	85−90 +14.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −13.8%	140−150 +13.8%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −15.8%	110−120 +15.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	237 −13.9%	270−280 +13.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140 −14.3%	160−170 +14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 −16.6%	260−270 +16.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
−9.9%

100−105

+9.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −14%	65−70 +14%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −12.2%	55−60 +12.2%
Hitman 3	40−45 −13.6%	50−55 +13.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	211 −13.7%	240−250 +13.7%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −13.3%	85−90 +13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	117 −11.1%	130−140 +11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −12.5%	45−50 +12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55 −9.1%	60−65 +9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −2.9%	35−40 +2.9%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −13.9%	90−95 +13.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	121 −15.7%	140−150 +15.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	56 −16.1%	65−70 +16.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−7.8%

55−60
+7.8%

This is how RTX 4080 Mobile and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

PRO W7900 is 13% faster in 1080p
PRO W7900 is 17% faster in 1440p
PRO W7900 is 16% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	65.07	76.35
Recency	3 January 2023	13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	295 Watt