Radeon RX 6600 LE vs GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Place in the ranking	4	96
Place by popularity	55	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	38.35	no data
Power efficiency	19.19	21.69
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	AD103	Navi 23
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)	8 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10240	1792
Core clock speed	2295 MHz	1626 MHz
Boost clock speed	2550 MHz	2495 MHz
Number of transistors	45,900 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	132 Watt
Texture fill rate	816.0	279.4
Floating-point processing power	52.22 TFLOPS	8.942 TFLOPS
ROPs	112	64
TMUs	320	112
Tensor Cores	320	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	80	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	310 mm	190 mm
Width	3-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1438 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	736.3 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4080 SUPER 89.06
+114%

RX 6600 LE 41.52

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4080 SUPER 34229
+114%

RX 6600 LE 15959

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	261 +118%	120−130 −118%
1440p	178 +123%	80−85 −123%
4K	117 +134%	50−55 −134%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.83	no data
1440p	5.61	no data
4K	8.54	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

246
+124%

110−120

−124%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +134%	50−55 −134%
Counter-Strike 2	240 +118%	110−120 −118%
Forza Horizon 4	614 +119%	280−290 −119%
Forza Horizon 5	250−260 +128%	110−120 −128%
Metro Exodus	198 +120%	90−95 −120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +123%	70−75 −123%
Valorant	550−600 +117%	270−280 −117%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +134%	50−55 −134%
Counter-Strike 2	214 +125%	95−100 −125%
Dota 2	179 +124%	80−85 −124%
Far Cry 5	161 +115%	75−80 −115%
Fortnite	300−350 +120%	140−150 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	568 +118%	260−270 −118%
Forza Horizon 5	250−260 +128%	110−120 −128%
Grand Theft Auto V	179 +124%	80−85 −124%
Metro Exodus	188 +121%	85−90 −121%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +115%	100−105 −115%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +123%	70−75 −123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +118%	80−85 −118%
Valorant	550−600 +117%	270−280 −117%
World of Tanks	270−280 +115%	130−140 −115%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +134%	50−55 −134%
Counter-Strike 2	190 +124%	85−90 −124%
Far Cry 5	170−180 +119%	80−85 −119%
Forza Horizon 4	527 +120%	240−250 −120%
Forza Horizon 5	250−260 +128%	110−120 −128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +115%	100−105 −115%
Valorant	550−600 +117%	270−280 −117%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	169 +125%	75−80 −125%
Grand Theft Auto V	169 +125%	75−80 −125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +119%	80−85 −119%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +133%	40−45 −133%
World of Tanks	500−550 +115%	240−250 −115%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +118%	40−45 −118%
Counter-Strike 2	123 +124%	55−60 −124%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +129%	70−75 −129%
Forza Horizon 4	397 +121%	180−190 −121%
Forza Horizon 5	190−200 +127%	85−90 −127%
Metro Exodus	171 +128%	75−80 −128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	221 +121%	100−105 −121%
Valorant	450−500 +123%	210−220 −123%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	134 +123%	60−65 −123%
Dota 2	187 +120%	85−90 −120%
Grand Theft Auto V	187 +120%	85−90 −120%
Metro Exodus	106 +136%	45−50 −136%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +120%	95−100 −120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +137%	27−30 −137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	187 +120%	85−90 −120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +128%	40−45 −128%
Counter-Strike 2	120−130 +125%	55−60 −125%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +133%	45−50 −133%
Fortnite	95−100 +140%	40−45 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	201 +123%	90−95 −123%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 +129%	55−60 −129%
Valorant	270−280 +131%	120−130 −131%

This is how RTX 4080 SUPER and RX 6600 LE compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 SUPER is 118% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 123% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 134% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	89.06	41.52
Recency	8 January 2024	8 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	132 Watt

RTX 4080 SUPER has a 114.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

RX 6600 LE, on the other hand, has 142.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600 LE in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.