GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6700

Place in performance ranking	55	4
Place by popularity	not in top-100	78
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	27.89	21.27
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Navi 22	AD103-400-A1
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	9 June 2021 (3 years ago)	31 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999
Current price	$551	$1202 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 has 31% better value for money than RTX 4080 SUPER.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	10240
Core clock speed	no data	2295 MHz
Boost clock speed	2450 MHz	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	320 Watt
Texture fill rate	352.8	816.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	310 mm
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	16 GB/s	23000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320.0 GB/s	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700 49.13

RTX 4080 SUPER 88.32
+79.8%

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms Radeon RX 6700 by 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6700 18973

RTX 4080 SUPER 34109
+79.8%

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms Radeon RX 6700 by 80% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	140−150 −81.4%	254 +81.4%
1440p	95−100 −88.4%	179 +88.4%
4K	65−70 −80%	117 +80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 −80.8%	235 +80.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 −87.3%	281 +87.3%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −87.7%	240−250 +87.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −84.6%	120−130 +84.6%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −81.5%	110−120 +81.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 −82.7%	200−210 +82.7%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 −81.1%	344 +81.1%
Hitman 3	65−70 −89.2%	120−130 +89.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	270−280 −86.3%	503 +86.3%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −88.8%	150−160 +88.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −90.8%	120−130 +90.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 −105%	614 +105%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −87.5%	150−160 +87.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −92.7%	212 +92.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 −82.3%	237 +82.3%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −87.7%	240−250 +87.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −84.6%	120−130 +84.6%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −81.5%	110−120 +81.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 −82.7%	200−210 +82.7%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −80%	270−280 +80%
Hitman 3	65−70 −89.2%	120−130 +89.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −85.5%	350−400 +85.5%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −90%	95 +90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −90.8%	120−130 +90.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 −89.3%	568 +89.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	300−310 −82.3%	547 +82.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −87.5%	150−160 +87.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −85.9%	158 +85.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 −90%	209 +90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −84.6%	120−130 +84.6%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −81.5%	110−120 +81.5%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −89.4%	322 +89.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 −84.8%	425 +84.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	290−300 −81.7%	527 +81.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 −87.9%	263 +87.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −81.3%	145 +81.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
−90.8%

120−130

+90.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −84.4%	160−170 +84.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −80%	140−150 +80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −80%	135 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −83.3%	165 +83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −86.7%	110−120 +86.7%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −93.6%	213 +93.6%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −80%	306 +80%
Hitman 3	70−75 −84.3%	120−130 +84.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 −81.6%	345 +81.6%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −80%	171 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 −80.5%	397 +80.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −84.2%	221 +84.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −81.4%	127 +81.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75
−84.3%

120−130

+84.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −95.6%	85−90 +95.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −97.1%	65−70 +97.1%
Hitman 3	45−50 −84.4%	80−85 +84.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −87.8%	169 +87.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −80%	135 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −85.5%	204 +85.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −92%	96 +92%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −80%	99 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −92.6%	50−55 +92.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −90.6%	305 +90.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −87.3%	206 +87.3%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −89.3%	142 +89.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −80%	81 +80%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
−85%

110−120

+85%

This is how RX 6700 and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 SUPER is 81% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 88% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 80% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	49.13	88.32
Recency	9 June 2021	31 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	320 Watt