RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile with RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4070 Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
50.95
+22.2%

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5695
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.5725.02
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD106no data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46084608
Core clock speed1395 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1695 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate244.1no data
Floating-point processing power15.62 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs144no data
Tensor Cores144no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Mobile 50.95
+22.2%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 41.71

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 Mobile 19590
+22.2%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 16037

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4070 Mobile 41090
+39.7%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 29411

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4070 Mobile 29950
+43.2%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20908

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4070 Mobile 157542
+90.7%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 82612

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 4070 Mobile 11960
+43.2%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 8351

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
+28%
100−110
−28%
1440p74
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
4K47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 127
+27%
100−105
−27%
Cyberpunk 2077 133
+33%
100−105
−33%
Elden Ring 147
+22.5%
120−130
−22.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%
Counter-Strike 2 111
+23.3%
90−95
−23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Forza Horizon 4 285
+23.9%
230−240
−23.9%
Metro Exodus 140
+27.3%
110−120
−27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+26.7%
75−80
−26.7%
Valorant 210−220
+25.9%
170−180
−25.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%
Counter-Strike 2 94
+25.3%
75−80
−25.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Dota 2 156
+30%
120−130
−30%
Elden Ring 227
+26.1%
180−190
−26.1%
Far Cry 5 103
+28.8%
80−85
−28.8%
Fortnite 200−210
+28.8%
160−170
−28.8%
Forza Horizon 4 233
+22.6%
190−200
−22.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+31.8%
110−120
−31.8%
Metro Exodus 111
+23.3%
90−95
−23.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+25.9%
170−180
−25.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+26.7%
75−80
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+24.3%
140−150
−24.3%
Valorant 210−220
+25.9%
170−180
−25.9%
World of Tanks 270−280
+26.8%
220−230
−26.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Dota 2 167
+28.5%
130−140
−28.5%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+28.2%
85−90
−28.2%
Forza Horizon 4 203
+26.9%
160−170
−26.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+25.9%
170−180
−25.9%
Valorant 210−220
+25.9%
170−180
−25.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 90
+28.6%
70−75
−28.6%
Elden Ring 125
+25%
100−105
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 89
+27.1%
70−75
−27.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+25%
140−150
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
World of Tanks 300−350
+25.4%
260−270
−25.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Counter-Strike 2 51
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+31.7%
120−130
−31.7%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+34%
100−105
−34%
Metro Exodus 105
+23.5%
85−90
−23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%
Valorant 180−190
+30%
140−150
−30%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Dota 2 90
+28.6%
70−75
−28.6%
Elden Ring 64
+28%
50−55
−28%
Grand Theft Auto V 89
+27.1%
70−75
−27.1%
Metro Exodus 44
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+25%
140−150
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89
+27.1%
70−75
−27.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+26%
50−55
−26%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Dota 2 146
+32.7%
110−120
−32.7%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+30.8%
65−70
−30.8%
Fortnite 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
Valorant 100−105
+25%
80−85
−25%

This is how RTX 4070 Mobile and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 28% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 23% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 34% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.95 41.71
Recency 3 January 2023 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm

RTX 4070 Mobile has a 22.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1853 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.