Radeon PRO W6300 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Place in performance ranking	5	327
Place by popularity	75	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	29.66	6.16
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	AD104-400	Navi 24
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data
Current price	$837 (1x MSRP)	$1628

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti has 381% better value for money than PRO W6300.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7680	768
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	35,800 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	285 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	626.4	97.92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Length	336 mm	no data
Width	3-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	21000 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	504.2 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Ti 82.25
+439%

PRO W6300 15.27

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon PRO W6300 by 439% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4070 Ti 31766
+439%

PRO W6300 5897

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon PRO W6300 by 439% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	226 +465%	40−45 −465%
1440p	150 +456%	27−30 −456%
4K	93 +481%	16−18 −481%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

236

+490%

40−45
−490%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +446%	24−27 −446%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +452%	27−30 −452%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +442%	45−50 −442%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +471%	21−24 −471%
Cyberpunk 2077	218 +445%	40−45 −445%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +462%	21−24 −462%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 +474%	35−40 −474%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +458%	45−50 −458%
Hitman 3	120−130 +486%	21−24 −486%
Horizon Zero Dawn	467 +449%	85−90 −449%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +452%	27−30 −452%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +490%	21−24 −490%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	575 +475%	100−105 −475%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +504%	24−27 −504%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +446%	24−27 −446%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +452%	27−30 −452%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +442%	45−50 −442%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +471%	21−24 −471%
Cyberpunk 2077	185 +517%	30−33 −517%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +462%	21−24 −462%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 +474%	35−40 −474%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +458%	45−50 −458%
Hitman 3	120−130 +486%	21−24 −486%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−350 +478%	60−65 −478%
Metro Exodus	83 +493%	14−16 −493%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +490%	21−24 −490%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	473 +456%	85−90 −456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	453 +466%	80−85 −466%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +504%	24−27 −504%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +446%	24−27 −446%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +452%	27−30 −452%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +471%	21−24 −471%
Cyberpunk 2077	167 +457%	30−33 −457%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +462%	21−24 −462%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +458%	45−50 −458%
Horizon Zero Dawn	351 +440%	65−70 −440%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	410 +447%	75−80 −447%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	222 +455%	40−45 −455%
Watch Dogs: Legion	152 +463%	27−30 −463%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+490%

21−24
−490%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +453%	30−33 −453%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +500%	24−27 −500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 +450%	18−20 −450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +500%	18−20 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +522%	18−20 −522%
Cyberpunk 2077	105 +483%	18−20 −483%
Far Cry 5	182 +507%	30−33 −507%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +509%	35−40 −509%
Hitman 3	120−130 +476%	21−24 −476%
Horizon Zero Dawn	273 +446%	50−55 −446%
Metro Exodus	148 +448%	27−30 −448%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	280 +460%	50−55 −460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +485%	27−30 −485%
Watch Dogs: Legion	121 +476%	21−24 −476%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+500%

21−24
−500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +450%	16−18 −450%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +475%	12−14 −475%
Hitman 3	75−80 +443%	14−16 −443%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +467%	24−27 −467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	104 +478%	18−20 −478%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	149 +452%	27−30 −452%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +508%	12−14 −508%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +475%	12−14 −475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +478%	9−10 −478%
Cyberpunk 2077	48 +500%	8−9 −500%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +456%	9−10 −456%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +453%	30−33 −453%
Horizon Zero Dawn	161 +496%	27−30 −496%
Metro Exodus	112 +522%	18−20 −522%
Watch Dogs: Legion	68 +467%	12−14 −467%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
+450%

18−20

−450%

This is how RTX 4070 Ti and PRO W6300 compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti is 465% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti is 456% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti is 481% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	82.25	15.27
Recency	3 January 2023	19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	285 Watt	25 Watt