GeForce4 Ti 4400 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with GeForce4 Ti 4400, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
7.75
+38650%

8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms Ti 4400 by a whopping 38650% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5411549
Place by popularity26not in top-100
Power efficiency41.62no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameVegaNV25 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)6 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data275 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data63 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data2.200
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Lengthno data216 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_18.1
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22-0−1
1440p16-0−1
4K10-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 63 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 18 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 39 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 43 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 13 0−1
Far Cry 5 21 0−1
Fortnite 47 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 33 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 0−1
Valorant 80−85 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 33 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 19 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 48 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9 0−1
Dota 2 51 0−1
Far Cry 5 20 0−1
Fortnite 31 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 28 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 10 0−1
Metro Exodus 16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21 0−1
Valorant 80−85 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9 0−1
Dota 2 48 0−1
Far Cry 5 19 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 0−1
Valorant 37 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 18 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 9 0−1
Metro Exodus 10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22 0−1
Valorant 90−95 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5 0−1
Far Cry 5 16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 10 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 18 0−1
Far Cry 5 8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.75 0.02
Recency 7 January 2020 6 February 2002
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 38650% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce4 Ti 4400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce4 Ti 4400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1573 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 65 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or GeForce4 Ti 4400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.