GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER with GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024
16 GB GDDR6X, 285 Watt
82.59
+183%

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms RTX 3050 A Mobile by a whopping 183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6195
Place by popularity82not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.91no data
Power efficiency19.9944.69
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAD103GA106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 January 2024 (1 year ago)2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84481792
Core clock speed2340 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed2610 MHz1343 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)285 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate689.075.21
Floating-point processing power44.1 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs26456
Tensor Cores26456
Ray Tracing Cores6614

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length310 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1313 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.3 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.59
+183%
RTX 3050 A Mobile 29.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31759
+183%
RTX 3050 A Mobile 11210

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD226
+201%
75−80
−201%
1440p157
+185%
55−60
−185%
4K96
+220%
30−35
−220%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.54no data
1440p5.09no data
4K8.32no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 189
+191%
65−70
−191%
Elden Ring 300−350
+198%
110−120
−198%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+193%
40−45
−193%
Counter-Strike 2 189
+191%
65−70
−191%
Forza Horizon 4 467
+192%
160−170
−192%
Metro Exodus 160−170
+193%
55−60
−193%
Red Dead Redemption 2 150−160
+210%
50−55
−210%
Valorant 450−500
+190%
170−180
−190%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+193%
40−45
−193%
Counter-Strike 2 171
+185%
60−65
−185%
Dota 2 174
+190%
60−65
−190%
Elden Ring 300−350
+198%
110−120
−198%
Far Cry 5 150
+200%
50−55
−200%
Fortnite 300−350
+208%
100−105
−208%
Forza Horizon 4 442
+195%
150−160
−195%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+190%
60−65
−190%
Metro Exodus 79
+193%
27−30
−193%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+187%
75−80
−187%
Red Dead Redemption 2 150−160
+210%
50−55
−210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+190%
60−65
−190%
Valorant 450−500
+190%
170−180
−190%
World of Tanks 270−280
+194%
95−100
−194%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+193%
40−45
−193%
Counter-Strike 2 150
+200%
50−55
−200%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+185%
55−60
−185%
Forza Horizon 4 407
+191%
140−150
−191%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+187%
75−80
−187%
Valorant 450−500
+190%
170−180
−190%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 155
+210%
50−55
−210%
Elden Ring 240−250
+200%
80−85
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+210%
50−55
−210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+192%
60−65
−192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+210%
30−33
−210%
World of Tanks 500−550
+187%
180−190
−187%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+190%
30−33
−190%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+217%
30−33
−217%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+191%
55−60
−191%
Forza Horizon 4 306
+206%
100−105
−206%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+184%
50−55
−184%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+189%
55−60
−189%
Valorant 400−450
+191%
140−150
−191%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+200%
12−14
−200%
Dota 2 182
+203%
60−65
−203%
Elden Ring 130−140
+198%
45−50
−198%
Grand Theft Auto V 182
+203%
60−65
−203%
Metro Exodus 84
+211%
27−30
−211%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+199%
70−75
−199%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+205%
21−24
−205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+203%
60−65
−203%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+203%
30−33
−203%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+217%
35−40
−217%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+200%
35−40
−200%
Fortnite 95−100
+220%
30−33
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 162
+195%
55−60
−195%
Valorant 230−240
+199%
80−85
−199%

This is how RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and RTX 3050 A Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 201% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 185% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 220% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 82.59 29.15
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 285 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 183.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 A Mobile, on the other hand, has 533.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2955 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 10 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.