RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4060
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
51.51
+30.2%

RTX 4060 outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53111
Place by popularity2not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency30.9023.73
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD107no data
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723072
Core clock speed1830 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2460 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate236.2no data
Floating-point processing power15.11 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs96no data
Tensor Cores96no data
Ray Tracing Cores24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2125 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth272.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 51.51
+30.2%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 19807
+30.2%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15209

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4060 38191
+32.1%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 28910

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4060 107451
+184%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4060 28111
+31.5%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 21379

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 156140
+35.5%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 115230

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD136
+36%
100−110
−36%
1440p69
+38%
50−55
−38%
4K40
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.20no data
1440p4.33no data
4K7.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 135
+35%
100−105
−35%
Cyberpunk 2077 139
+39%
100−105
−39%
Elden Ring 148
+34.5%
110−120
−34.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+36.5%
85−90
−36.5%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+36.3%
80−85
−36.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+35%
40−45
−35%
Forza Horizon 4 272
+36%
200−210
−36%
Metro Exodus 165
+37.5%
120−130
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+37.1%
70−75
−37.1%
Valorant 210−220
+35.6%
160−170
−35.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+36.5%
85−90
−36.5%
Counter-Strike 2 91
+40%
65−70
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Dota 2 155
+40.9%
110−120
−40.9%
Elden Ring 180−190
+35%
140−150
−35%
Far Cry 5 149
+35.5%
110−120
−35.5%
Fortnite 200−210
+38.7%
150−160
−38.7%
Forza Horizon 4 217
+35.6%
160−170
−35.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 158
+31.7%
120−130
−31.7%
Metro Exodus 118
+31.1%
90−95
−31.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+34.4%
160−170
−34.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+37.1%
70−75
−37.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+33.8%
130−140
−33.8%
Valorant 210−220
+35.6%
160−170
−35.6%
World of Tanks 270−280
+32.9%
210−220
−32.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+36.5%
85−90
−36.5%
Counter-Strike 2 76
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+37.5%
80−85
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 190
+35.7%
140−150
−35.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+34.4%
160−170
−34.4%
Valorant 210−220
+35.6%
160−170
−35.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 90
+38.5%
65−70
−38.5%
Elden Ring 110−120
+37.6%
85−90
−37.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+38.5%
65−70
−38.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+34.6%
130−140
−34.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%
World of Tanks 300−350
+32%
250−260
−32%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+40%
60−65
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 46
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+32.5%
120−130
−32.5%
Forza Horizon 4 129
+35.8%
95−100
−35.8%
Metro Exodus 111
+30.6%
85−90
−30.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+34.7%
75−80
−34.7%
Valorant 180−190
+32.1%
140−150
−32.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%
Dota 2 89
+36.9%
65−70
−36.9%
Elden Ring 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%
Grand Theft Auto V 89
+36.9%
65−70
−36.9%
Metro Exodus 38
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+36.2%
130−140
−36.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89
+36.9%
65−70
−36.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+33.8%
65−70
−33.8%
Fortnite 80−85
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+40%
50−55
−40%
Valorant 100−110
+36%
75−80
−36%

This is how RTX 4060 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is 36% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 is 38% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.51 39.55
Recency 18 May 2023 21 March 2023

RTX 4060 has a 30.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

The GeForce RTX 4060 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 19990 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.