Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
57.82
+691%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 691% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38541
Place by popularity8610
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.89no data
Power efficiency24.6111.41
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAD106Cezanne
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4352448
Core clock speed2310 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2535 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate344.853.20
Floating-point processing power22.06 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs13628
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 57.82
+691%
Vega 7 7.31

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 43112
+721%
Vega 7 5249

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 32275
+864%
Vega 7 3348

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 165263
+568%
Vega 7 24726

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD173
+621%
24
−621%
1440p92
+268%
25
−268%
4K55
+206%
18
−206%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.88no data
1440p5.42no data
4K9.07no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 259
+1424%
16−18
−1424%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+886%
14−16
−886%
Cyberpunk 2077 176
+878%
18
−878%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 198
+1065%
16−18
−1065%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+468%
28
−468%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+886%
14−16
−886%
Cyberpunk 2077 137
+879%
14
−879%
Far Cry 5 191
+855%
20
−855%
Fortnite 240−250
+286%
63
−286%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+470%
37
−470%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+794%
18
−794%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+608%
24−27
−608%
Valorant 300−310
+300%
75−80
−300%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 117
+588%
16−18
−588%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+591%
23
−591%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+886%
14−16
−886%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+379%
58
−379%
Cyberpunk 2077 115
+1050%
10
−1050%
Far Cry 5 182
+911%
18
−911%
Fortnite 240−250
+800%
27
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+503%
35
−503%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+847%
16−18
−847%
Grand Theft Auto V 163
+859%
17
−859%
Metro Exodus 130
+900%
13
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+670%
23
−670%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 270
+1321%
19
−1321%
Valorant 300−310
+311%
73
−311%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+657%
21
−657%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+886%
14−16
−886%
Cyberpunk 2077 103
+1044%
9
−1044%
Far Cry 5 171
+850%
18
−850%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+681%
27
−681%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+608%
24−27
−608%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+915%
13
−915%
Valorant 300−310
+1100%
25
−1100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 240−250
+1636%
14
−1636%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+626%
50−55
−626%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+1022%
9−10
−1022%
Metro Exodus 79
+1029%
7−8
−1029%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+349%
35−40
−349%
Valorant 300−350
+606%
48
−606%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+931%
12−14
−931%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+933%
6−7
−933%
Far Cry 5 127
+807%
14−16
−807%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+924%
16−18
−924%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+773%
10−12
−773%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+979%
14−16
−979%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+683%
6−7
−683%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+461%
18−20
−461%
Metro Exodus 48
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+1480%
5−6
−1480%
Valorant 300−350
+1140%
25
−1140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+1450%
6−7
−1450%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Far Cry 5 65
+829%
7−8
−829%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+1036%
10−12
−1036%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+1271%
7−8
−1271%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+1029%
7−8
−1029%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 12
+0%
12
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 621% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 268% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 206% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is ahead in 60 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.82 7.31
Recency 18 May 2023 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 691% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has 266.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1106 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2407 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.