RTX A2000 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

Place in performance ranking	29	194
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	29.96	no data
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	AD106	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data
Current price	$615 (1.2x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	2560
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	893 MHz
Boost clock speed	2535 MHz	1687 MHz
Number of transistors	22,900 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	344.8	108.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	240 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	8.9	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 59.31
+132%

RTX A2000 Mobile 25.56

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 43112
+139%

RTX A2000 Mobile 18058

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 139% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 116054
+82.1%

RTX A2000 Mobile 63738

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 82% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 32275
+145%

RTX A2000 Mobile 13157

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 145% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 165263
+174%

RTX A2000 Mobile 60336

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 174% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	166 +113%	78 −113%
1440p	92 +124%	41 −124%
4K	54 +35%	40 −35%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +124%	45−50 −124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 +118%	55 −118%
Battlefield 5	190−200 +126%	80−85 −126%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +131%	50−55 −131%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +120%	55−60 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +124%	65−70 −124%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +127%	110−120 −127%
Hitman 3	120−130 +131%	50−55 −131%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 +128%	100−110 −128%
Metro Exodus	190−200 +129%	80−85 −129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +121%	65−70 −121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +122%	135 −122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +126%	62 −126%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +124%	45−50 −124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +131%	39 −131%
Battlefield 5	190−200 +126%	80−85 −126%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +131%	50−55 −131%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +120%	55−60 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +124%	65−70 −124%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +127%	110−120 −127%
Hitman 3	70−75 +119%	32 −119%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 +128%	100−110 −128%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +122%	36 −122%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +121%	65−70 −121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	250−260 +131%	108 −131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	220−230 +129%	96 −129%
Watch Dogs: Legion	160−170 +122%	70−75 −122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +124%	45−50 −124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +119%	32 −119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +131%	50−55 −131%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +120%	55−60 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +127%	110−120 −127%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 +128%	100−110 −128%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +123%	94 −123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +120%	50 −120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +124%	29 −124%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

150−160

+121%

65−70
−121%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +124%	45−50 −124%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +118%	55−60 −118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +122%	27−30 −122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +122%	27 −122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +129%	35−40 −129%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +126%	53 −126%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +116%	50−55 −116%
Hitman 3	70−75 +126%	30−35 −126%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +126%	50−55 −126%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +124%	49 −124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +122%	63 −122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +119%	30−35 −119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +125%	20 −125%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
+121%

40−45

−121%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +120%	24−27 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +125%	20−22 −125%
Hitman 3	45−50 +125%	20−22 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +117%	30−33 −117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +106%	17 −106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +127%	33 −127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +119%	16−18 −119%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +100%	14−16 −100%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +129%	35−40 −129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +117%	30−33 −117%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +120%	24−27 −120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+127%

21−24

−127%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

170−180

+130%

74
−130%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

140−150

+126%

62
−126%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

110−120

+120%

50
−120%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

95−100
+132%

−132%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
+120%

−120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

+100%

6−7
−100%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 113% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 124% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 35% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	59.31	25.56
Recency	18 May 2023	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	95 Watt