GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

Place in the ranking	35	482
Place by popularity	90	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	64.04	no data
Power efficiency	24.79	6.29
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	AD106	N11E-GTX-A1
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)	6 January 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	768
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	575 MHz
Boost clock speed	2535 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	22,900 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	344.8	no data
Floating-point processing power	22.06 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	136	no data
Tensor Cores	136	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	34	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data
Length	240 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2x2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	no data
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	11
Shader Model	6.7	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 59.43
+550%

GTX 485M SLI 9.14

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 43112
+708%

GTX 485M SLI 5334

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 116054
+367%

GTX 485M SLI 24830

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	550−600 +518%	89 −518%
Full HD	174 +79.4%	97 −79.4%
1440p	94 +571%	14−16 −571%
4K	57 +613%	8−9 −613%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.87	no data
1440p	5.31	no data
4K	8.75	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

130−140
+661%

18−20

−661%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +290%	30−33 −290%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +661%	18−20 −661%
Forza Horizon 4	344 +830%	35−40 −830%
Forza Horizon 5	150−160 +552%	21−24 −552%
Metro Exodus	160 +540%	24−27 −540%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 +332%	24−27 −332%
Valorant	260−270 +663%	35−40 −663%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +290%	30−33 −290%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +661%	18−20 −661%
Dota 2	163 +394%	30−35 −394%
Far Cry 5	139 +266%	35−40 −266%
Fortnite	230−240 +331%	50−55 −331%
Forza Horizon 4	272 +635%	35−40 −635%
Forza Horizon 5	150−160 +552%	21−24 −552%
Grand Theft Auto V	163 +394%	30−35 −394%
Metro Exodus	127 +408%	24−27 −408%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +199%	70−75 −199%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 +332%	24−27 −332%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +521%	27−30 −521%
Valorant	260−270 +663%	35−40 −663%
World of Tanks	270−280 +108%	130−140 −108%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +290%	30−33 −290%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +661%	18−20 −661%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +211%	35−40 −211%
Forza Horizon 4	235 +535%	35−40 −535%
Forza Horizon 5	150−160 +552%	21−24 −552%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +199%	70−75 −199%
Valorant	260−270 +663%	35−40 −663%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Dota 2	101 +818%	10−12 −818%
Grand Theft Auto V	101 +742%	12−14 −742%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +298%	40−45 −298%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +763%	8−9 −763%
World of Tanks	350−400 +494%	65−70 −494%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +412%	16−18 −412%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +742%	18−20 −742%
Forza Horizon 4	153 +665%	20−22 −665%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +664%	14−16 −664%
Metro Exodus	119 +644%	16−18 −644%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	96 +700%	12−14 −700%
Valorant	230−240 +909%	21−24 −909%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +162%	12−14 −162%
Dota 2	101 +405%	20−22 −405%
Grand Theft Auto V	101 +432%	18−20 −432%
Metro Exodus	48 +860%	5−6 −860%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +704%	24−27 −704%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +650%	6−7 −650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	101 +432%	18−20 −432%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +850%	8−9 −850%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +162%	12−14 −162%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +855%	10−12 −855%
Fortnite	95−100 +967%	9−10 −967%
Forza Horizon 4	80 +627%	10−12 −627%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 +983%	6−7 −983%
Valorant	130−140 +1356%	9−10 −1356%