GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and GeForce GTX 1650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
59.38
+190%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms GTX 1650 by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34271
Place by popularity903
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.9838.38
Power efficiency24.8318.84
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAD106TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 67% better value for money than GTX 1650.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4352896
Core clock speed2310 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed2535 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate344.893.24
Floating-point processing power22.06 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs13656
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length240 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA8.97.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 59.38
+190%
GTX 1650 20.48

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 22832
+190%
GTX 1650 7874

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 43112
+216%
GTX 1650 13645

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 116054
+160%
GTX 1650 44694

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 32275
+251%
GTX 1650 9203

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 165263
+227%
GTX 1650 50549

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 600933
+61%
GTX 1650 373333

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD173
+151%
69
−151%
1440p94
+135%
40
−135%
4K57
+148%
23
−148%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.88
−33.6%
2.16
+33.6%
1440p5.31
−42.5%
3.73
+42.5%
4K8.75
−35.1%
6.48
+35.1%
  • GTX 1650 has 34% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 has 43% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 has 35% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+273%
35−40
−273%
Elden Ring 167
+157%
65−70
−157%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+77.3%
66
−77.3%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+273%
35−40
−273%
Forza Horizon 4 344
+266%
94
−266%
Metro Exodus 160
+142%
66
−142%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+40.3%
77
−40.3%
Valorant 260−270
+214%
85
−214%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+56%
75
−56%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+273%
35−40
−273%
Dota 2 163
+98.8%
82
−98.8%
Elden Ring 220−230
+243%
65−70
−243%
Far Cry 5 139
+54.4%
90
−54.4%
Fortnite 230−240
+184%
82
−184%
Forza Horizon 4 272
+268%
74
−268%
Grand Theft Auto V 163
+117%
75
−117%
Metro Exodus 127
+189%
44
−189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+56.9%
130−140
−56.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+286%
28
−286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+172%
60−65
−172%
Valorant 260−270
+480%
46
−480%
World of Tanks 270−280
+18.7%
230−240
−18.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+113%
55
−113%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+273%
35−40
−273%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+73.5%
65−70
−73.5%
Forza Horizon 4 235
+279%
62
−279%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+252%
61
−252%
Valorant 260−270
+281%
70
−281%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 101
+216%
30−35
−216%
Elden Ring 140−150
+324%
30−35
−324%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+206%
30−35
−206%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1.7%
170−180
−1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+306%
17
−306%
World of Tanks 350−400
+181%
130−140
−181%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+129%
38
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+329%
16−18
−329%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+186%
55−60
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+240%
45
−240%
Metro Exodus 119
+190%
41
−190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+243%
27−30
−243%
Valorant 230−240
+480%
40
−480%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Dota 2 101
+248%
29
−248%
Elden Ring 70−75
+393%
14−16
−393%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+248%
29
−248%
Metro Exodus 48
+300%
12
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+237%
60−65
−237%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
+248%
29
−248%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+317%
18
−317%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+304%
24−27
−304%
Fortnite 95−100
+284%
24−27
−284%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+208%
26
−208%
Valorant 130−140
+519%
21
−519%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3
+0%
3
+0%
Dota 2 59
+0%
59
+0%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 151% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 135% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 148% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 519% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is ahead in 55 tests (87%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.38 20.48
Recency 18 May 2023 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 189.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has 120% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 971 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24282 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.