Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics vs GeForce RTX 4050

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131not rated
Place by popularity45not in top-100
Power efficiency25.69no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameAD107Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2023 (2 years ago)28 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560128
Core clock speed2505 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2640 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate211.22.400
Floating-point processing power13.52 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808
Tensor Cores120no data
Ray Tracing Cores18no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width96 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth216.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2.170
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 4050 has a 460% more advanced lithography process.

R2E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4050 and Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop card while Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050
AMD Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2264 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4050 or Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.