Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs GeForce RTX 4050
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 4050 with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.
RTX 4050 outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS by a whopping 238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 122 | 422 |
| Place by popularity | 41 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 26.02 | 25.67 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | no data |
| GPU code name | AD107 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 2023 (1 year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 18,900 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 13.52 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | no data |
| TMUs | 80 | no data |
| Tensor Cores | 120 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5x |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 8448 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 216.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
| CUDA | 8.9 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 120−130
+233%
| 36
−233%
|
| 1440p | 55−60
+224%
| 17
−224%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 37.43 | 11.08 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 30 Watt |
RTX 4050 has a 237.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 4050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
