Radeon Graphics 128SP vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.26no data
Power efficiency11.82no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA102Raphael
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 January 2022 (2 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10752128
Core clock speed1560 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1860 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million3,400 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)450 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate625.017.60
Floating-point processing power40 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs1128
TMUs3368
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores842

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length336 mmno data
Width3-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1313 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,008 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 January 2022 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 450 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 128SP has an age advantage of 8 months, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 2900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and Radeon Graphics 128SP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP
Radeon Graphics 128SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 3241 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 128SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.