Quadro P4200 Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Place in the ranking	10	193
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.30	no data
Power efficiency	11.83	20.72
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GA102	GP104
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 January 2022 (3 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,999	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10752	2304
Core clock speed	1560 MHz	1215 MHz
Boost clock speed	1860 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	450 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	625.0	213.1
Floating-point processing power	40 TFLOPS	6.82 TFLOPS
ROPs	112	64
TMUs	336	144
Tensor Cores	336	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	84	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	336 mm	no data
Width	3-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz	1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth	1,008 GB/s	224.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3090 Ti 77.16
+157%

P4200 Max-Q 30.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3090 Ti 29656
+157%

P4200 Max-Q 11544

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	220 +159%	85−90 −159%
1440p	153 +178%	55−60 −178%
4K	108 +170%	40−45 −170%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	9.09	no data
1440p	13.07	no data
4K	18.51	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	180−190 +159%	70−75 −159%
Cyberpunk 2077	219 +158%	85−90 −158%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +160%	45−50 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	180−190 +159%	70−75 −159%
Cyberpunk 2077	101 +189%	35−40 −189%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +159%	170−180 −159%
Forza Horizon 5	200−210 +172%	75−80 −172%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +176%	55−60 −176%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +158%	55−60 −158%
Valorant	400−450 +167%	160−170 −167%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +160%	45−50 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	180−190 +159%	70−75 −159%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 +187%	30−33 −187%
Dota 2	185 +164%	70−75 −164%
Far Cry 5	136 +172%	50−55 −172%
Fortnite	300−350 +180%	110−120 −180%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +159%	170−180 −159%
Forza Horizon 5	207 +159%	80−85 −159%
Grand Theft Auto V	170 +162%	65−70 −162%
Metro Exodus	73 +170%	27−30 −170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +169%	80−85 −169%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +158%	55−60 −158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +168%	65−70 −168%
Valorant	400−450 +167%	160−170 −167%
World of Tanks	270−280 +179%	100−105 −179%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +160%	45−50 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	180−190 +159%	70−75 −159%
Cyberpunk 2077	76 +181%	27−30 −181%
Dota 2	195 +160%	75−80 −160%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +164%	55−60 −164%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +159%	170−180 −159%
Forza Horizon 5	200−210 +172%	75−80 −172%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +169%	80−85 −169%
Valorant	400−450 +167%	160−170 −167%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	151 +175%	55−60 −175%
Grand Theft Auto V	151 +175%	55−60 −175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +169%	65−70 −169%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +166%	35−40 −166%
World of Tanks	500−550 +158%	200−210 −158%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +190%	30−33 −190%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +173%	40−45 −173%
Cyberpunk 2077	52 +189%	18−20 −189%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +167%	60−65 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +173%	110−120 −173%
Forza Horizon 5	150 +173%	55−60 −173%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +172%	50−55 −172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +174%	65−70 −174%
Valorant	350−400 +158%	140−150 −158%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	100−105 +186%	35−40 −186%
Dota 2	181 +159%	70−75 −159%
Grand Theft Auto V	181 +159%	70−75 −159%
Metro Exodus	84 +180%	30−33 −180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +161%	80−85 −161%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +167%	24−27 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	181 +159%	70−75 −159%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +160%	35−40 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	100−105 +186%	35−40 −186%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 +170%	10−11 −170%
Dota 2	184 +163%	70−75 −163%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +163%	40−45 −163%
Fortnite	95−100 +174%	35−40 −174%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +172%	60−65 −172%
Forza Horizon 5	94 +169%	35−40 −169%
Valorant	210−220 +163%	80−85 −163%

This is how RTX 3090 Ti and P4200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 3090 Ti is 159% faster in 1080p
RTX 3090 Ti is 178% faster in 1440p
RTX 3090 Ti is 170% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	77.16	30.04
Recency	27 January 2022	21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	450 Watt	100 Watt

RTX 3090 Ti has a 156.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

P4200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has 350% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.