Quadro P4200 Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Place in performance ranking	16	176
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.90	no data
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Ampere GA102	GP104
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 September 2020 (3 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data
Current price	$1135 (0.9x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10240	2304
Core clock speed	1370 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1667 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	532.8	213.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Quadro P4200 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	285 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	19000 MHz	7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	912.4 GB/s	224.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 Ti 70.33
+138%

P4200 Max-Q 29.60

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti outperforms Quadro P4200 Max-Q by 138% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3080 Ti 27193
+138%

P4200 Max-Q 11446

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti outperforms Quadro P4200 Max-Q by 138% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	211 +148%	85−90 −148%
1440p	143 +138%	60−65 −138%
4K	103 +158%	40−45 −158%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

219

+143%

90−95
−143%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−110 +138%	45−50 −138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 +148%	50−55 −148%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +150%	90−95 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +142%	60−65 −142%
Cyberpunk 2077	184 +145%	75−80 −145%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +142%	45−50 −142%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +158%	55−60 −158%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +144%	85−90 −144%
Hitman 3	140−150 +148%	60−65 −148%
Horizon Zero Dawn	448 +149%	180−190 −149%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +142%	55−60 −142%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +148%	50−55 −148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	489 +145%	200−210 −145%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +140%	50−55 −140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−110 +138%	45−50 −138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 +148%	50−55 −148%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +150%	90−95 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +142%	60−65 −142%
Cyberpunk 2077	160 +146%	65−70 −146%
Far Cry 5	140 +155%	55−60 −155%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +140%	35−40 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +144%	85−90 −144%
Hitman 3	140−150 +148%	60−65 −148%
Horizon Zero Dawn	419 +146%	170−180 −146%
Metro Exodus	167 +139%	70−75 −139%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +148%	50−55 −148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	310 +138%	130−140 −138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	372 +148%	150−160 −148%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +140%	50−55 −140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−110 +138%	45−50 −138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100 +150%	40−45 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +142%	60−65 −142%
Cyberpunk 2077	146 +143%	60−65 −143%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +142%	45−50 −142%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +144%	85−90 −144%
Horizon Zero Dawn	310 +138%	130−140 −138%
Metro Exodus	146 +143%	60−65 −143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	181 +141%	75−80 −141%
Watch Dogs: Legion	97 +143%	40−45 −143%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+148%

50−55
−148%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +155%	65−70 −155%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +140%	60−65 −140%
Hitman 3	85−90 +149%	35−40 −149%
Red Dead Redemption 2	93 +166%	35−40 −166%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +160%	30−33 −160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	86 +146%	35−40 −146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +138%	45−50 −138%
Cyberpunk 2077	99 +148%	40−45 −148%
Far Cry 5	176 +151%	70−75 −151%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +144%	70−75 −144%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240 +140%	100−105 −140%
Metro Exodus	141 +156%	55−60 −156%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	269 +145%	110−120 −145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +156%	50−55 −156%
Watch Dogs: Legion	89 +154%	35−40 −154%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	118 +162%	45−50 −162%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +149%	45−50 −149%
Hitman 3	60−65 +158%	24−27 −158%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +142%	45−50 −142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	94 +169%	35−40 −169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	152 +153%	60−65 −153%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +167%	21−24 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	61 +154%	24−27 −154%
Battlefield 5	136 +147%	55−60 −147%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +157%	30−33 −157%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 +138%	21−24 −138%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +146%	50−55 −146%
Horizon Zero Dawn	145 +142%	60−65 −142%
Metro Exodus	108 +140%	45−50 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	59 +146%	24−27 −146%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80
+157%

30−33

−157%

This is how RTX 3080 Ti and P4200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 3080 Ti is 148% faster in 1080p
RTX 3080 Ti is 138% faster in 1440p
RTX 3080 Ti is 158% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	70.33	29.60
Recency	24 September 2020	21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	100 Watt