ATI Radeon 9200 vs GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile with Radeon 9200, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3080 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
42.75
+427400%

RTX 3080 Mobile outperforms ATI 9200 by a whopping 427400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking921524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.510.02
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGA104RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)1 May 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6144no data
Core clock speed1110 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate296.61.000
Floating-point processing power18.98 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs1924
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 Mobile 42.75
+427400%
ATI 9200 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 Mobile 16475
+549067%
ATI 9200 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120-0−1
1440p75-0−1
4K45-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 134 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 122 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 98 0−1
Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 117 0−1
Far Cry 5 85−90 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 190−200 0−1
Hitman 3 130 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180 0−1
Metro Exodus 130−140 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 188 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79 0−1
Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 99 0−1
Far Cry 5 85−90 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 190−200 0−1
Hitman 3 117 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180 0−1
Metro Exodus 144 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 96 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 213 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 227 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 90 0−1
Far Cry 5 85−90 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 157 0−1
Hitman 3 108 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 155 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 185 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 106 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 74 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 0−1
Hitman 3 76 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 121 0−1
Metro Exodus 90 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 141 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 177 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 83 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 0−1
Hitman 3 47 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 33 0−1
Metro Exodus 74 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 87 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 79 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 33 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 46 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.75 0.01
Recency 12 January 2021 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 28 Watt

RTX 3080 Mobile has a 427400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200, on the other hand, has 310.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
ATI Radeon 9200
Radeon 9200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 796 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.