GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q vs ATI Radeon 9200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1522not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.02no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV280GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 2003 (21 year ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed250 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1035 MHz
Number of transistors36 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00082.80
Floating-point processing powerno data5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 75 Watt

ATI 9200 has 167.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200
Radeon 9200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 49 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 233 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.