Matrox Millennium G400 MAX vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking18not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.34no data
Power efficiency14.75no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameGA102Toucan
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)20 May 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10240no data
Core clock speed1365 MHz150 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Wattno data
Texture fill rate532.80.3
Floating-point processing power34.1 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1122
TMUs3202
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Length285 mm150 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XSDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB32 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth912.4 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL3.0None
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2021 20 May 1999
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 250 nm

RTX 3080 Ti has an age advantage of 22 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Matrox Millennium G400 MAX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Matrox Millennium G400 MAX
Millennium G400 MAX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 10584 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G400 MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.