FireStream 9350 vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.66no data
Power efficiency13.94no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGA102Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)1 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102401440
Core clock speed1365 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate532.850.40
Floating-point processing power34.1 TFLOPS2.016 TFLOPS
ROPs11232
TMUs32072
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length285 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth912.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.65.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2021 1 June 2010
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 3080 Ti has an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

FireStream 9350, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and FireStream 9350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is a desktop card while FireStream 9350 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMD FireStream 9350
FireStream 9350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10718 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.