GeForce 7300 GT vs RTX 3070 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGA104G73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)15 May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120no data
Core clock speed780 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1290 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt24 Watt
Texture fill rate206.42.800
Floating-point processing power13.21 TFLOPSno data
ROPs808
TMUs1608
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz325 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s10.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 January 2021 15 May 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 24 Watt

RTX 3070 Max-Q has an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

7300 GT, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and GeForce 7300 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q is a notebook card while GeForce 7300 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT
GeForce 7300 GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 144 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 173 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.