Quadro K200M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking165not rated
Place by popularity90not in top-100
Power efficiency28.34no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGA106GK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)22 August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840192
Core clock speed900 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,250 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate171.013.60
Floating-point processing power10.94 TFLOPS0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs12016
Tensor Cores120no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.1.126
CUDA8.63.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 January 2021 22 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 3060 Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K200M, on the other hand, has 128.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and Quadro K200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K200M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K200M
Quadro K200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4956 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.