FirePro M4170 vs GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile with FirePro M4170, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
24.09
+748%

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms M4170 by a whopping 748% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking252815
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Power efficiency24.47no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGA106Opal
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)23 April 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed735 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed1035 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors13,250 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate82.8021.60
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs8024
Tensor Cores80no data
Ray Tracing Cores20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.66.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.21.2.170
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 24.09
+748%
FirePro M4170 2.84

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile Samples: 7780 10094
+750%
FirePro M4170 Samples: 24 1188

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD74
+825%
8−9
−825%
1440p42
+950%
4−5
−950%
4K26
+767%
3−4
−767%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+769%
16−18
−769%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+786%
7−8
−786%
Hogwarts Legacy 64
+814%
7−8
−814%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 108
+800%
12−14
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+769%
16−18
−769%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+883%
6−7
−883%
Far Cry 5 79
+778%
9−10
−778%
Fortnite 120−130
+757%
14−16
−757%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+870%
10−11
−870%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+840%
10−11
−840%
Hogwarts Legacy 50
+900%
5−6
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+860%
10−11
−860%
Valorant 160−170
+833%
18−20
−833%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 98
+880%
10−11
−880%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+769%
16−18
−769%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+763%
30−33
−763%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+800%
5−6
−800%
Dota 2 118
+883%
12−14
−883%
Far Cry 5 74
+825%
8−9
−825%
Fortnite 120−130
+757%
14−16
−757%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+870%
10−11
−870%
Forza Horizon 5 84
+833%
9−10
−833%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+840%
10−11
−840%
Hogwarts Legacy 40
+900%
4−5
−900%
Metro Exodus 57
+850%
6−7
−850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+860%
10−11
−860%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+820%
10−11
−820%
Valorant 160−170
+833%
18−20
−833%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+790%
10−11
−790%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+900%
4−5
−900%
Dota 2 113
+842%
12−14
−842%
Far Cry 5 68
+750%
8−9
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+870%
10−11
−870%
Hogwarts Legacy 33
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+860%
10−11
−860%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+900%
5−6
−900%
Valorant 112
+833%
12−14
−833%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+757%
14−16
−757%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+867%
18−20
−867%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+925%
4−5
−925%
Metro Exodus 34
+750%
4−5
−750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+872%
18−20
−872%
Valorant 200−210
+758%
24−27
−758%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+763%
8−9
−763%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Far Cry 5 50
+900%
5−6
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+800%
7−8
−800%
Hogwarts Legacy 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+883%
6−7
−883%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+780%
5−6
−780%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Metro Exodus 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+867%
3−4
−867%
Valorant 140−150
+800%
16−18
−800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+850%
4−5
−850%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+900%
1−2
−900%
Dota 2 54
+800%
6−7
−800%
Far Cry 5 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+760%
5−6
−760%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%

This is how RTX 3050 Ti Mobile and FirePro M4170 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 825% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 950% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 767% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.09 2.84
Recency 11 May 2021 23 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has a 748.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M4170 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M4170 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
AMD FirePro M4170
FirePro M4170

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4592 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate FirePro M4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile or FirePro M4170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.