T1200 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 3050 4 GB RTX 3050 6 GB RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB GA107
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB with T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 8 GB
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
32.81
+62.2%

RTX 3050 8 GB outperforms T1200 Mobile by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking167278
Place by popularity11not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.07no data
Power efficiency17.4114.69
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA106no data
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed1552 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate142.2no data
Floating-point processing power9.098 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data
Tensor Cores80no data
Ray Tracing Cores20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 8 GB 32.81
+62.2%
T1200 Mobile 20.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 8 GB 12612
+62.2%
T1200 Mobile 7774

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+61%
59
−61%
1440p50−55
+51.5%
33
−51.5%
4K170−180
+56%
109
−56%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.62no data
1440p4.98no data
4K1.46no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 89
+0%
89
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+0%
73
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
World of Tanks 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+0%
37
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
World of Tanks 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+0%
47
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how RTX 3050 8 GB and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 8 GB is 61% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 8 GB is 52% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 8 GB is 56% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.81 20.23
Recency 4 January 2022 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

RTX 3050 8 GB has a 62.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has 36.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is a desktop card while T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
vs
GTX 1660 Super GeForce GTX 1660 Super
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580 Radeon Pro 580
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
vs
RX 5600 OEM Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Tesla PG503-216 Tesla PG503 216
vs
A16 PCIe A16 PCIe
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
RX 7700 Radeon RX 7700
RTX 3060 GA104 GeForce RTX 3060 GA104
vs
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile RX 8800 XT
vs
RX 8800 XT GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
RX 6500M Radeon RX 6500M
vs
RX 7600M RX 7600M
RTX A500 Embedded RTX A500 Embedded
vs
T500 Max-Q T500 Max Q
Arc A380 Arc A380
vs
RX 7700 Radeon RX 7700
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
vs
Riva TNT2 Riva TNT2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 13344 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.