Radeon RX 7400 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile with Radeon RX 7400, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
2023
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
21.71

RX 7400 outperforms 3050 6GB Mobile by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking268223
Place by popularity53not in top-100
Power efficiency29.2951.58
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGN20-P0-R 6 GBNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2023 (2 years ago)8 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601792
Core clock speed1237 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed1492 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)43 Watt
Texture fill rateno data257.6
Floating-point processing powerno data16.49 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
−21.4%
85−90
+21.4%
1440p34
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−20.3%
160−170
+20.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
−23.5%
100−105
+23.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−17%
55−60
+17%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−20.3%
160−170
+20.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
−25%
80−85
+25%
Far Cry 5 85
−17.6%
100−105
+17.6%
Fortnite 110−120
−20.7%
140−150
+20.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−21.6%
90−95
+21.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−17%
55−60
+17%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%
Valorant 160−170
−22.7%
200−210
+22.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−20.3%
160−170
+20.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−18.1%
300−310
+18.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Dota 2 120−130
−24%
150−160
+24%
Far Cry 5 78
−21.8%
95−100
+21.8%
Fortnite 110−120
−20.7%
140−150
+20.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−21.6%
90−95
+21.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 92
−19.6%
110−120
+19.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−17%
55−60
+17%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−17.6%
60−65
+17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%
Valorant 160−170
−22.7%
200−210
+22.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Dota 2 120−130
−24%
150−160
+24%
Far Cry 5 74
−21.6%
90−95
+21.6%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−17%
55−60
+17%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−20%
60−65
+20%
Valorant 160−170
−22.7%
200−210
+22.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
−20.7%
140−150
+20.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−20%
60−65
+20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−20.5%
200−210
+20.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
−25%
50−55
+25%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−20.7%
210−220
+20.7%
Valorant 200−210
−25%
250−260
+25%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
−23.1%
80−85
+23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Far Cry 5 52
−25%
65−70
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−25%
70−75
+25%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Valorant 130−140
−24.1%
170−180
+24.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Dota 2 75−80
−23.4%
95−100
+23.4%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%

This is how RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and RX 7400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7400 is 21% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7400 is 18% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.71 27.40
Recency 6 January 2023 8 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 43 Watt

RX 7400 has a 26.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 39.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 979 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.