Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
2023
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
22.90

AI PRO R9700 outperforms RTX 3050 6GB Mobile by a whopping 211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking26116
Place by popularity78not in top-100
Power efficiency29.1218.11
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGN20-P0-R 6 GBNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2023 (2 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Core clock speed1237 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1492 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data747.5
Floating-point processing powerno data47.84 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB32 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
−200%
210−220
+200%
1440p34
−194%
100−110
+194%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−203%
400−450
+203%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
−209%
250−260
+209%
God of War 50−55
−200%
150−160
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−201%
280−290
+201%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−203%
400−450
+203%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
−197%
190−200
+197%
Far Cry 5 85
−206%
260−270
+206%
Fortnite 110−120
−202%
350−400
+202%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−201%
280−290
+201%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−211%
230−240
+211%
God of War 50−55
−200%
150−160
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−208%
280−290
+208%
Valorant 160−170
−207%
500−550
+207%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−201%
280−290
+201%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−203%
400−450
+203%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−195%
750−800
+195%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−204%
140−150
+204%
Dota 2 120−130
−189%
350−400
+189%
Far Cry 5 78
−208%
240−250
+208%
Fortnite 110−120
−202%
350−400
+202%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−201%
280−290
+201%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−211%
230−240
+211%
God of War 50−55
−200%
150−160
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 92
−204%
280−290
+204%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−194%
150−160
+194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−208%
280−290
+208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
−208%
280−290
+208%
Valorant 160−170
−207%
500−550
+207%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−201%
280−290
+201%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−208%
120−130
+208%
Dota 2 120−130
−189%
350−400
+189%
Far Cry 5 74
−211%
230−240
+211%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−201%
280−290
+201%
God of War 50−55
−200%
150−160
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−208%
280−290
+208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−200%
150−160
+200%
Valorant 160−170
−207%
500−550
+207%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
−202%
350−400
+202%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−206%
150−160
+206%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−201%
500−550
+201%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
−200%
120−130
+200%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−186%
500−550
+186%
Valorant 200−210
−200%
600−650
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−208%
200−210
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−204%
70−75
+204%
Far Cry 5 52
−208%
160−170
+208%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−200%
180−190
+200%
God of War 27−30
−204%
85−90
+204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−197%
110−120
+197%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−204%
170−180
+204%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Valorant 130−140
−194%
400−450
+194%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Dota 2 75−80
−199%
230−240
+199%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
God of War 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−200%
75−80
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−200%
75−80
+200%

This is how RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 200% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 194% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.90 71.19
Recency 6 January 2023 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has 400% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 210.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 938 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.