Tesla A100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking226not rated
Place by popularity74not in top-100
Power efficiency27.97no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGN20-P0GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20487936
Core clock speed1238 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data38,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)260 Watt
Texture fill rateno data550.6
Floating-point processing powerno data17.62 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB40 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,229 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 260 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 11 months, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla A100, on the other hand, has a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Tesla A100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook card while Tesla A100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1305 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 239 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.