Radeon HD 7660G vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon HD 7660G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
22.22
+1832%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms HD 7660G by a whopping 1832% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2711088
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Power efficiency28.212.50
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Devastator
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048384
Core clock speed1238 MHz686 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz686 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data16.46
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5268 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed12000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 22.22
+1832%
HD 7660G 1.15

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 15712
+1386%
HD 7660G 1057

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 43216
+855%
HD 7660G 4523

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 65252
+918%
HD 7660G 6409

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 480364
+633%
HD 7660G 65558

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p190−200
+1800%
10
−1800%
Full HD62
+288%
16
−288%
1200p170−180
+1789%
9
−1789%
1440p43
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
4K26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170
+2025%
8−9
−2025%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+3200%
2−3
−3200%
Sons of the Forest 50
+2400%
2−3
−2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 93
+9200%
1−2
−9200%
Counter-Strike 2 125
+1983%
6−7
−1983%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Far Cry 5 68
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
Fortnite 110−120
+5600%
2−3
−5600%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1200%
7−8
−1200%
Forza Horizon 5 87 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+878%
9−10
−878%
Sons of the Forest 32
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Valorant 160−170
+400%
30−35
−400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+8800%
1−2
−8800%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+544%
39
−544%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Dota 2 118
+638%
16
−638%
Far Cry 5 64
+3100%
2−3
−3100%
Fortnite 110−120
+5600%
2−3
−5600%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1200%
7−8
−1200%
Forza Horizon 5 77 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 86 0−1
Metro Exodus 49
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+878%
9−10
−878%
Sons of the Forest 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+1250%
6−7
−1250%
Valorant 160−170
+400%
30−35
−400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Dota 2 112
+647%
15
−647%
Far Cry 5 61
+2950%
2−3
−2950%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1200%
7−8
−1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+878%
9−10
−878%
Sons of the Forest 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+667%
6−7
−667%
Valorant 160−170
+400%
30−35
−400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+5600%
2−3
−5600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+2214%
7−8
−2214%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Metro Exodus 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1350%
12−14
−1350%
Valorant 190−200
+6467%
3−4
−6467%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 18 0−1
Far Cry 5 49 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+193%
14−16
−193%
Metro Exodus 17 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Valorant 130−140
+2100%
6−7
−2100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 6 0−1
Dota 2 62 0−1
Far Cry 5 19 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Sons of the Forest 18−20 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and HD 7660G compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 1800% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 288% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 1789% faster in 1200p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2050% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 9200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3050 4GB Mobile surpassed HD 7660G in all 38 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.22 1.15
Recency 11 May 2021 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 8 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 1832.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7660G, on the other hand, has 71.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7660G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Radeon HD 7660G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1738 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 147 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Radeon HD 7660G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.