Radeon HD 7670M vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon HD 7670M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
24.55
+1896%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms HD 7670M by a whopping 1896% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2291050
Place by popularity52not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Power efficiency28.174.23
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Thames
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)17 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$629.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048480
Core clock speed1238 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data716 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data14.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.576 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 24.55
+1896%
HD 7670M 1.23

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 15712
+1380%
HD 7670M 1062

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 43216
+765%
HD 7670M 4995

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 11949
+1350%
HD 7670M 824

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 65252
+899%
HD 7670M 6535

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p300−350
+1665%
17
−1665%
Full HD64
+220%
20
−220%
1440p45
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
4K29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data31.50
1440pno data315.00
4Kno data629.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+367%
9−10
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
Elden Ring 51 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Counter-Strike 2 38
+322%
9−10
−322%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+1433%
3−4
−1433%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+1338%
8−9
−1338%
Metro Exodus 83
+1975%
4−5
−1975%
Red Dead Redemption 2 87
+1350%
6−7
−1350%
Valorant 133
+2117%
6−7
−2117%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+233%
9−10
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Dota 2 96
+9500%
1−2
−9500%
Elden Ring 86 0−1
Far Cry 5 73
+630%
10−11
−630%
Fortnite 120−130
+2380%
5−6
−2380%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+1075%
8−9
−1075%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+8500%
1−2
−8500%
Metro Exodus 57
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1007%
14−16
−1007%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+1029%
7−8
−1029%
Valorant 68
+2167%
3−4
−2167%
World of Tanks 250−260
+457%
46
−457%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+933%
3−4
−933%
Dota 2 112
+11100%
1−2
−11100%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+660%
10−11
−660%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+913%
8−9
−913%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1007%
14−16
−1007%
Valorant 95−100
+2375%
4−5
−2375%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 48
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Elden Ring 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2400%
7−8
−2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 0−1
World of Tanks 160−170
+2229%
7−8
−2229%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+1320%
5−6
−1320%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Metro Exodus 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Valorant 65−70
+1000%
6−7
−1000%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Dota 2 44
+175%
16−18
−175%
Elden Ring 18−20 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+193%
14−16
−193%
Metro Exodus 17 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+193%
14−16
−193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 62
+288%
16−18
−288%
Far Cry 5 30−35 0−1
Fortnite 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Forza Horizon 4 34
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Valorant 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and HD 7670M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 1665% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 220% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2150% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 11100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3050 4GB Mobile surpassed HD 7670M in all 41 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.55 1.23
Recency 11 May 2021 17 February 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 20 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 1895.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7670M, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7670M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Radeon HD 7670M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1403 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 385 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7670M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.