Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking199not rated
Place by popularity59not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Montevina
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2008 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204810
Core clock speed1238 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12000 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_210

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 65911
+45356%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 145

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD by 45356% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 8 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 940 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 187 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.