Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce RTX 2080

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 with Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 215 Watt
47.66
+390%

RTX 2080 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking69460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.74no data
Power efficiency15.57no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTU104Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 September 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores294496
Core clock speed1515 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1710 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Wattno data
Texture fill rate314.6no data
Floating-point processing power10.07 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs184no data
Tensor Cores368no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 2080 47.66
+390%
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.72

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 17810
+256%
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD147
+444%
27−30
−444%
1440p105
+400%
21−24
−400%
4K75
+436%
14−16
−436%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.76no data
1440p6.66no data
4K9.32no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 130−140
+415%
27−30
−415%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+414%
21−24
−414%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 130−140
+415%
27−30
−415%
Battlefield 5 163
+298%
40−45
−298%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+414%
21−24
−414%
Far Cry 5 117
+277%
30−35
−277%
Fortnite 199
+255%
55−60
−255%
Forza Horizon 4 156
+280%
40−45
−280%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+393%
27−30
−393%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 209
+533%
30−35
−533%
Valorant 263
+192%
90−95
−192%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 130−140
+415%
27−30
−415%
Battlefield 5 155
+278%
40−45
−278%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+95.8%
140−150
−95.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+414%
21−24
−414%
Dota 2 140−150
+119%
65−70
−119%
Far Cry 5 112
+261%
30−35
−261%
Fortnite 173
+209%
55−60
−209%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+273%
40−45
−273%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+393%
27−30
−393%
Grand Theft Auto V 131
+274%
35−40
−274%
Metro Exodus 90
+374%
18−20
−374%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 188
+470%
30−35
−470%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+654%
24−27
−654%
Valorant 254
+182%
90−95
−182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 145
+254%
40−45
−254%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+414%
21−24
−414%
Dota 2 140−150
+119%
65−70
−119%
Far Cry 5 106
+242%
30−35
−242%
Forza Horizon 4 132
+222%
40−45
−222%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+393%
27−30
−393%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 169
+412%
30−35
−412%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 106
+342%
24−27
−342%
Valorant 223
+396%
45−50
−396%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 156
+179%
55−60
−179%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+339%
70−75
−339%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+623%
12−14
−623%
Metro Exodus 60
+500%
10−11
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+400%
35−40
−400%
Valorant 247
+138%
100−110
−138%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 125
+443%
21−24
−443%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+460%
10−11
−460%
Far Cry 5 99
+395%
20−22
−395%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+436%
21−24
−436%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+400%
16−18
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+400%
18−20
−400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 128
+574%
18−20
−574%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Grand Theft Auto V 107
+435%
20−22
−435%
Metro Exodus 39
+680%
5−6
−680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+660%
10−11
−660%
Valorant 234
+378%
45−50
−378%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+591%
10−12
−591%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Dota 2 120−130
+259%
30−35
−259%
Far Cry 5 59
+556%
9−10
−556%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+406%
16−18
−406%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 69
+667%
9−10
−667%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65
+622%
9−10
−622%

This is how RTX 2080 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 is 444% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 is 400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 is 436% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2080 is 680% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2080 surpassed Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in all 42 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.66 9.72
Recency 20 September 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm

RTX 2080 has a 390.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 is a desktop card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2297 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2080 or Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.