RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell vs GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
36.45
+6.3%

RTX 2080 Mobile outperforms RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking147162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.5137.31
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU104BGB206
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 January 2019 (6 years ago)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores29444352
Core clock speed1380 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate292.6265.2
Floating-point processing power9.362 TFLOPS16.97 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs184136
Tensor Cores368136
Ray Tracing Cores4634

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.512.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD142
+9.2%
130−140
−9.2%
1440p94
+10.6%
85−90
−10.6%
4K65
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+7.4%
190−200
−7.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+13.3%
75−80
−13.3%
God of War 85−90
+10%
80−85
−10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 132
+10%
120−130
−10%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+7.4%
190−200
−7.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+13.3%
75−80
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 104
+9.5%
95−100
−9.5%
Fortnite 206
+8.4%
190−200
−8.4%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+13.1%
130−140
−13.1%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+16%
100−105
−16%
God of War 85−90
+10%
80−85
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 243
+10.5%
220−230
−10.5%
Valorant 276
+10.4%
250−260
−10.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 118
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+7.4%
190−200
−7.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+6.9%
260−270
−6.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+13.3%
75−80
−13.3%
Dota 2 131
+9.2%
120−130
−9.2%
Far Cry 5 97
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Fortnite 169
+12.7%
150−160
−12.7%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+11.5%
130−140
−11.5%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+16%
100−105
−16%
God of War 85−90
+10%
80−85
−10%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+12.2%
90−95
−12.2%
Metro Exodus 90
+12.5%
80−85
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 214
+7%
200−210
−7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
+8.8%
160−170
−8.8%
Valorant 266
+6.4%
250−260
−6.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 117
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+13.3%
75−80
−13.3%
Dota 2 125
+13.6%
110−120
−13.6%
Far Cry 5 96
+6.7%
90−95
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 139
+6.9%
130−140
−6.9%
God of War 85−90
+10%
80−85
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 174
+8.8%
160−170
−8.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+11.8%
85−90
−11.8%
Valorant 205
+7.9%
190−200
−7.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 155
+10.7%
140−150
−10.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+7.1%
85−90
−7.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+6.7%
240−250
−6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+13.8%
65−70
−13.8%
Metro Exodus 55
+10%
50−55
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+9.4%
160−170
−9.4%
Valorant 260
+8.3%
240−250
−8.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 115
+15%
100−105
−15%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Far Cry 5 82
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+10.9%
110−120
−10.9%
God of War 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 124
+12.7%
110−120
−12.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+11.4%
70−75
−11.4%
Metro Exodus 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Valorant 240
+9.1%
220−230
−9.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68
+13.3%
60−65
−13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Dota 2 119
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Far Cry 5 52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
God of War 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 61
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 61
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%

This is how RTX 2080 Mobile and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 9% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 11% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.45 34.28
Recency 29 January 2019 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2080 Mobile has a 6.3% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 153 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.