Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Ti with Quadro RTX 6000, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Ti
2018
11 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
54.25
+16%

RTX 2080 Ti outperforms RTX 6000 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4668
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.745.77
Power efficiency15.5312.87
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 September 2018 (6 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2080 Ti has 277% better value for money than RTX 6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43524608
Core clock speed1350 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate420.2509.8
Floating-point processing power13.45 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs8896
TMUs272288
Tensor Cores544576
Ray Tracing Cores6872

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount11 GB24 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth616.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Ti 54.25
+16%
RTX 6000 46.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Ti 21680
+16%
RTX 6000 18692

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX 2080 Ti 137055
RTX 6000 148363
+8.3%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RTX 2080 Ti 132930
+4.7%
RTX 6000 126987

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

RTX 2080 Ti 165093
+3.5%
RTX 6000 159550

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD165
+17.9%
140−150
−17.9%
1440p122
+22%
100−110
−22%
4K93
+16.3%
80−85
−16.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.05
+643%
44.99
−643%
1440p8.19
+669%
62.99
−669%
4K10.74
+633%
78.74
−633%
  • RTX 2080 Ti has 643% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Ti has 669% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Ti has 633% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+27%
100−105
−27%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+21.4%
70−75
−21.4%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 300−310
+20%
250−260
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
+18.3%
120−130
−18.3%
Metro Exodus 110
+22.2%
90−95
−22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 106
+17.8%
90−95
−17.8%
Valorant 290
+16%
250−260
−16%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 235
+17.5%
200−210
−17.5%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+20%
45−50
−20%
Dota 2 138
+25.5%
110−120
−25.5%
Far Cry 5 92
+22.7%
75−80
−22.7%
Fortnite 224
+17.9%
190−200
−17.9%
Forza Horizon 4 300−310
+20%
250−260
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
+18.3%
120−130
−18.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+21.8%
110−120
−21.8%
Metro Exodus 100
+17.6%
85−90
−17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 249
+18.6%
210−220
−18.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90
+20%
75−80
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+16%
150−160
−16%
Valorant 170
+21.4%
140−150
−21.4%
World of Tanks 270−280
+16.3%
240−250
−16.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+20%
40−45
−20%
Dota 2 141
+17.5%
120−130
−17.5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+21.1%
95−100
−21.1%
Forza Horizon 4 300−310
+20%
250−260
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
+18.3%
120−130
−18.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 183
+22%
150−160
−22%
Valorant 259
+17.7%
220−230
−17.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Dota 2 110−120
+22.2%
90−95
−22.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+22.2%
90−95
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+16.7%
150−160
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+26%
50−55
−26%
World of Tanks 350−400
+22.7%
300−310
−22.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+23.1%
130−140
−23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+22%
150−160
−22%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+17.6%
85−90
−17.6%
Metro Exodus 98
+22.5%
80−85
−22.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+20%
95−100
−20%
Valorant 204
+20%
170−180
−20%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Dota 2 142
+18.3%
120−130
−18.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 142
+18.3%
120−130
−18.3%
Metro Exodus 51
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 209
+16.1%
180−190
−16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+20%
35−40
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+18.3%
120−130
−18.3%
World of Tanks 270
+17.4%
230−240
−17.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 62
+24%
50−55
−24%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Dota 2 139
+26.4%
110−120
−26.4%
Far Cry 5 105
+16.7%
90−95
−16.7%
Fortnite 96
+20%
80−85
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+21.2%
85−90
−21.2%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Valorant 113
+18.9%
95−100
−18.9%

This is how RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Ti is 18% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 22% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 16% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 54.25 46.77
Recency 20 September 2018 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 24 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 260 Watt

RTX 2080 Ti has a 16% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 4% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 118.2% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4333 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 134 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.