Quadro RTX 5000 vs GeForce RTX 2070

Place in performance ranking	85	88
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	31.20	17.67
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Turing TU106	TU104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	27 August 2018 (5 years ago)	13 August 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	$2,299
Current price	$309 (0.6x MSRP)	$1540 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 has 77% better value for money than RTX 5000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	3072
Core clock speed	1410 MHz	1620 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1815 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	233.3	348.5

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 41.78
+0.7%

RTX 5000 41.50

GeForce RTX 2070 outperforms Quadro RTX 5000 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2070 16172
+0.7%

RTX 5000 16063

GeForce RTX 2070 outperforms Quadro RTX 5000 by 1% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

RTX 2070 87137

RTX 5000 105557
+21.1%

Quadro RTX 5000 outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 by 21% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

RTX 2070 87172

RTX 5000 93705
+7.5%

Quadro RTX 5000 outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 by 7% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

RTX 2070 95666

RTX 5000 96650
+1%

Quadro RTX 5000 outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 by 1% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	129 +7.5%	120−130 −7.5%
1440p	87 +2.4%	85−90 −2.4%
4K	61 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

75−80
+7.1%

70−75

−7.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	101 +1%	100−105 −1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	87 +2.4%	85−90 −2.4%
Battlefield 5	126 +5%	120−130 −5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	147 +5%	140−150 −5%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +7.1%	70−75 −7.1%
Far Cry 5	114 +3.6%	110−120 −3.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	103 +3%	100−105 −3%
Forza Horizon 4	142 +1.4%	140−150 −1.4%
Hitman 3	164 +2.5%	160−170 −2.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	113 +2.7%	110−120 −2.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	117 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	112 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	107 +7%	100−105 −7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	86 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	73 +4.3%	70−75 −4.3%
Battlefield 5	117 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130 +8.3%	120−130 −8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +7.1%	70−75 −7.1%
Far Cry 5	110 +10%	100−105 −10%
Far Cry New Dawn	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	135 +3.8%	130−140 −3.8%
Hitman 3	144 +2.9%	140−150 −2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	88 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
Metro Exodus	78 +4%	75−80 −4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65 +8.3%	60−65 −8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	105 +5%	100−105 −5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	158 +5.3%	150−160 −5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	94 +4.4%	90−95 −4.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	64 +6.7%	60−65 −6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65 +8.3%	60−65 −8.3%
Battlefield 5	108 +8%	100−105 −8%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +7.1%	70−75 −7.1%
Far Cry 5	104 +4%	100−105 −4%
Far Cry New Dawn	90 +5.9%	85−90 −5.9%
Forza Horizon 4	110 +10%	100−105 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	87 +2.4%	85−90 −2.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	64 +6.7%	60−65 −6.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	87 +2.4%	85−90 −2.4%
Hitman 3	93 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	61 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
Metro Exodus	50 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 +5%	40−45 −5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	76 +1.3%	75−80 −1.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	52 +4%	50−55 −4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Battlefield 5	88 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Far Cry 5	88 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Forza Horizon 4	93 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	47 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	51 +2%	50−55 −2%
Hitman 3	50 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	32 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40 +14.3%	35−40 −14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 +5%	60−65 −5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	36 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Battlefield 5	55 +10%	50−55 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Far Cry 5	49 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	51 +2%	50−55 −2%
Forza Horizon 4	63 +5%	60−65 −5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%